What Is an MDL (Multidistrict Litigation)?

Learn how MDL consolidation works under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 — the JPML, transferee courts, and why MDLs exist for efficiency.

Last updated: 2026-03-01

What Is an MDL?

Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) is a special federal legal procedure used to consolidate multiple civil lawsuits that share common factual questions into a single federal court for coordinated pretrial proceedings. MDLs are authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1407, a federal statute enacted in 1968.

The purpose of an MDL is efficiency. When hundreds or thousands of people file separate lawsuits against the same defendant(s) over the same product, drug, or event, it would be wasteful for every court across the country to independently handle the same discovery, expert testimony, and pretrial motions. An MDL consolidates these common tasks before a single experienced judge, saving time and judicial resources while ensuring consistent rulings.

Crucially, an MDL is not a class action. In an MDL, each plaintiff maintains their own individual lawsuit with their own unique facts, injuries, and damages. The cases are only consolidated for pretrial purposes — once those proceedings are complete, cases that have not settled can be sent back to their original courts for individual trials.

As of 2025, MDLs account for a significant portion of the entire federal civil caseload. Major active MDLs include the Roundup weed killer litigation (MDL 2741), the AFFF firefighting foam litigation (MDL 2873), and numerous pharmaceutical and medical device MDLs.

1968
Year MDL statute enacted (28 U.S.C. § 1407)
50%+
Share of all federal civil cases in MDLs
180+
Active MDL proceedings (as of 2025)

How MDLs Are Created (The JPML)

The process of creating an MDL begins with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), a special body of seven sitting federal judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the United States. The JPML has the exclusive authority to transfer civil actions to a single district for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

An MDL transfer can be initiated in several ways:

  • 1.
    Motion by a party: Any plaintiff or defendant in a pending federal case can file a motion with the JPML requesting consolidation of related cases.
  • 2.
    Sua sponte by the JPML: The panel can initiate transfer on its own when it identifies related cases across multiple districts.
  • 3.
    Suggestion by a judge: A federal judge handling one of the related cases can suggest consolidation to the JPML.

The JPML then holds a hearing (typically during one of its regularly scheduled sessions held roughly every two months at rotating locations across the country) to determine whether consolidation is appropriate. The panel must find that:

  • The cases involve common questions of fact
  • Consolidation will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses
  • Transfer will promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation

If the JPML approves consolidation, it selects a transferee court and transferee judge — the federal district and judge who will oversee all pretrial proceedings. The selection is based on the judge's expertise, the geographic distribution of cases, and the court's available resources.

Think You May Qualify?

Get a free, no-obligation case review from an experienced attorney. You pay nothing unless you win.

Check Your Eligibility — Free Review

What Happens in an MDL

Once cases are transferred to the MDL, the transferee judge manages coordinated pretrial proceedings. This process typically follows a structured path that can span several years:

The MDL Process: From Filing to Resolution

STEP 1 Individual Lawsuits Filed Nationwide STEP 2 JPML Reviews & Transfers to MDL Court STEP 3 Plaintiffs' Leadership Appointed STEP 4 Coordinated Discovery & Motions STEP 5 Bellwether (Test) Trials Global Settlement Reached Cases Remanded for Trial

Plaintiffs' leadership: Early in the MDL, the transferee judge appoints a leadership structure — typically lead counsel, co-lead counsel, and a plaintiffs' steering committee (PSC). These attorneys make strategic decisions on behalf of all plaintiffs in the MDL, manage discovery, and negotiate with defendants. Individual plaintiffs still have their own attorneys, but the PSC handles MDL-wide work.

Coordinated discovery: The discovery process — document production, depositions, expert reports — is conducted once for all cases in the MDL, rather than being repeated in each individual case. This is where the efficiency gains are most significant.

Bellwether trials: The judge typically selects a small number of representative cases (called bellwether trials) to be tried before a jury. The results of these trials help both sides evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the overall litigation and often drive global settlement negotiations.

Resolution: Most MDLs ultimately resolve through a global settlement. If no global settlement is reached, individual cases can be remanded (sent back) to their original courts for individual trials.

MDL vs. Class Action

MDLs and class actions are often confused, but they are fundamentally different legal mechanisms. Understanding the distinction is important for anyone considering joining a mass tort lawsuit. For a full comparison, see our guide to class action vs. mass tort.

MDL vs. Class Action: Key Differences

Comparison of how MDL and class action lawsuits differ in structure, control, damages, and resolution
FeatureMDL (Multidistrict Litigation)Class Action
Individual claims Each plaintiff has their own case with unique facts One lawsuit represents all class members
Control over case You retain control and can accept/reject settlement offers Class representative makes decisions for the entire class
Damages Individual damages based on your specific injuries Same or similar damages for all class members
Settlement Individual settlement amounts vary by case Single settlement divided among all class members
Opt-in/out You must actively file a case to be included You are automatically included unless you opt out
Consolidation Pretrial only — cases can return to original courts Full consolidation through resolution
Common use Mass tort (drugs, devices, toxic exposure) Consumer fraud, securities, employment

Current Major MDLs

Dozens of significant MDLs are currently active in federal courts across the country. Here are some of the largest and most notable as of 2025:

Notable Active MDL Proceedings

MDL Number Lawsuit Court Cases Pending MDL 2741 Roundup / Glyphosate (Monsanto/Bayer) N.D. California 4,000+ MDL 2873 AFFF Firefighting Foam (3M, DuPont, others) D. South Carolina 7,000+ N/A (CLJA) Camp Lejeune Water (U.S. Government) E.D. North Carolina Thousands MDL 3060 Hair Relaxer Cancer (L'Oreal, Revlon, others) N.D. Illinois 8,000+ MDL 3026 NEC Baby Formula (Abbott, Mead Johnson) N.D. Illinois 1,000+ MDL 3043 Tylenol Autism/ADHD (Retailers/distributors) S.D. New York Hundreds Case counts are approximate and subject to change. Data from JPML and federal court records.

Each of these MDLs involves a different product or exposure but follows the same general procedural framework under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. The transferee judge in each MDL has significant discretion in how they manage the proceedings, which is why the experience and judicial philosophy of the assigned judge can materially affect outcomes.

Your Individual Case in an MDL

If your case becomes part of an MDL, here is what you should know about how it affects you personally:

  • You keep your own attorney. Even though the MDL has appointed leadership counsel, you still have your own individual attorney who represents your specific interests and communicates with you about your case.
  • Your individual facts matter. Your specific injuries, medical history, exposure details, and damages are unique to your case. These individual facts determine your settlement value.
  • You can accept or reject settlement offers. If a global settlement is proposed, you typically have the right to participate or opt out, depending on the settlement terms.
  • Shared work benefits you. The coordinated discovery conducted in the MDL — documents obtained, depositions taken, expert reports filed — benefits every plaintiff, including you, without each person having to pay for separate discovery.

If you believe you have a potential mass tort claim, the first step is to consult with an attorney who can evaluate whether your case belongs in an existing MDL or should be filed independently. Most mass tort attorneys offer free initial consultations and work on a contingency fee basis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does joining an MDL mean I lose control of my individual case?
No. Unlike a class action, an MDL preserves your individual claim. Your case is consolidated only for pretrial proceedings — discovery, motions, and potentially bellwether trials. You retain control over whether to accept a settlement offer, and your individual damages are assessed separately. If pretrial proceedings conclude without a global settlement, your case can be sent back to its original court for trial.
How long does an MDL typically take?
MDLs vary widely in duration, but most take 2 to 5+ years from creation to resolution. The timeline depends on the complexity of the science involved, the number of plaintiffs, the cooperation of defendants, and how bellwether trial results influence settlement negotiations. Some MDLs, like asbestos litigation, have continued for decades. For a more detailed timeline, see our guide on how long mass tort lawsuits take.
What is the JPML and what does it do?
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) is a special panel of seven federal judges authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to consolidate civil actions involving common questions of fact. Any party in a pending federal lawsuit — or the JPML itself — can initiate the transfer process. The JPML selects the transferee court and the judge who will oversee the consolidated proceedings based on factors like the judge's expertise, caseload, and geographic convenience.
Can my case be in an MDL if I filed in state court?
MDLs only consolidate cases filed in federal court. If you filed in state court, your case will not be transferred to the MDL. However, defendants sometimes remove state cases to federal court (if there is federal jurisdiction), which could then result in transfer to the MDL. Some mass tort litigations have parallel state court proceedings alongside the federal MDL. Your attorney can advise on the best venue for your specific case.

Legal Disclaimer

This is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal developments. Consult a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction for advice about your specific situation.

Think You May Qualify?

Get a free, no-obligation case review from an experienced attorney. You pay nothing unless you win.

Check Your Eligibility — Free Review